Fountain v. Warden, Franklin Medical Center et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 10 and that this Court DISMISSES Plaintiff's Complaint for Failure to Prosecute. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 7/9/13. (sem1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DANIEL ANTONIO FOUNTAIN, Sr., Case No. 2:13-cv-271 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers Plaintiff, v. WARDEN, FRANKLIN MEDICAL CENTER, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed on June 7, 2013. (ECF No. 10.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute. The Magistrate Judge recommended dismissal under Rule 41(b) for Plaintiff’s failure to supply the Court with an updated address despite multiple Orders from this Court directing him to do so. (ECF No. 10 at PAGEID# 51-52.) The Report and Recommendation specifically advises Plaintiff that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the Report results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (ECF No. 10 at PAGEID# 53.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. In light of the facts that Plaintiff filed no objections and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court DISMISSES Plaintiff’s Complaint for failure to prosecute pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?