Baily v. Commissioner Social Security

Filing 30

ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees; adopting Report and Recommendations re 29 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff is AWARDED an attorney fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, in the total amount of $3,243.75, plus $12.00 in expenses, for a total award of $3,255.75. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/6/2015. (cw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JAMES C. BAILY, Plaintiff, vs. Civil Action 2:13-cv-344 Judge Marbley Magistrate Judge King COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER This case sought review, under the provisions of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying plaintiff’s application for supplemental security income. On May 30, 2014, this Court reversed the decision of the Commissioner and remanded the action to the Commissioner for further proceedings. 24. Order, Doc. No. Final judgment pursuant to Sentence 4 of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) was entered that same date. Judgment, Doc. No. 25. On October 27, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended that plaintiff’s unopposed motion for an award of attorney fees, Motion for Attorney Fees, ECF No. 28, be granted. Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29. Although the parties were advised of their right to object to the recommendation, and of the consequences of their failure to do so, there has been no objection. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 29, is ADOPTED AND AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorney Fees, ECF No. 28, is GRANTED. Plaintiff is AWARDED an attorney fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 1 § 2412, in the total amount of $3,243.75, plus $12.00 in expenses, for a total award of $3,255.75. s/Algenon L. Marbley Algenon L. Marbley United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?