Lemmon v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
25
ORDER - The Court ADOPTS 24 the Report and Recommendation, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the case is REMANDED to the Commissioner under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/18/14. (jk1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Vicki L. Lemmon,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:13-cv-410
Judge Michael H. Watson
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
On January 13, 2014, United States Magistrate Judge Norah McCann
King, to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 )(B) and
General Order 95-2 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a
Report and Recommendation concerning the disposition of Vicki L. Lemmon's
("Plaintiff') Complaint in this Social Security case. The Report and
Recommendation recommended reversing the Commissioner's decision and
remanding the case for further administrative proceedings.
The Report and Recommendation notified the parties of their right to file
objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 636(b )( 1). The Report and Recommendation further specifically advised the
parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within
fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the
District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting
the Report and Recommendation. Report and Recommendation 7-8, ECF No.
24. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were
filed.
Having received no objections, the Report and Recommendation is
ADOPTED, the decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and the case is
REMANDED to the Commissioner under Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
W!oak
fiiCHAELH:WASON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?