Orrand et al v. Sanjects Group LLC
Filing
39
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Motions terminated: 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 23 Denying MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Raymond Orrand, Trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Plan, Oh io Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship Fund, 23 MOTION for Order to Show Cause filed by Raymond Orrand, Trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health & Welfare Plan, Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship Fund, Ohio Operating Engineers Education & Safety Fund.. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 6/24/14. (lvw1)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
RAYMOND ORRAND,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case No.: 2:13-cv-504
JUDGE SMITH
Magistrate Judge King
SANJECTS GROUP, LLC,
Defendants.
ORDER
On May 15, 2014, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and
Recommendation and Order recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Contempt be denied
because the Audit Order was not served on Defendant. The Report and Recommendation further
ordered Plaintiff to provide the name and address of Defendant’s principal and for the Court to
served upon the identified principal a copy of the Audit Order. (See R&R, Doc. 27). The Court
notes that Plaintiff has filed a notice identifying Defendant’s principal and the Clerk sent a copy
of the Audit Order to the principal.
The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and
Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been
no objection to the Report and Recommendation.
Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
Plaintiff’s Motion for Contempt is hereby DENIED.
The Clerk shall remove Documents 23 and 27 from the Court’s pending motions list.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ George C. Smith__________________
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?