Brooks v. Potter et al

Filing 27

ORDER ADOPTING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 24 in that the Motion for an Emergency Temporary Protection Order filed by Gordon Brooks is DENIED. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 10/29/13. (sem1)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
GORDON BROOKS,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:13-cv-0507
Judge Gregory L. Frost
Magistrate Judge King

v.
MARY POTTER, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER

Plaintiff Gordon Brooks is an incarcerated state inmate who has brought this action under
42 U.S.C. § 1983 against four employees of the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and
Correction. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation filed on September 18, 2013, in which the Magistrate Judge recommended
that Plaintiff’s “motion for a temporary protection order” be denied. (ECF No. 24.)
The Report and Recommendation specifically advises that the failure to object to the
Report and Recommendation within fourteen days of the date of the Report results in a waiver of
the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the District
Court’s decision adopting the Report and Recommendation. (Id. at PageID# 170.) The time
period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not
objected to the Report and Recommendation.

1

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections
have been filed and the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the
Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for an
emergency temporary protection order (ECF No. 3).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2