Wilson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 29

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 28 Report and Recommendations and awards attorney's fees to Plaintiff. Signed by Senior Judge Peter C. Economus on 10/30/2014. (ds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TERESA WILSON, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-832 Judge Peter C. Economus v. COMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Magistrate Judge King MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Defendant. This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) of the Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 28.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court grant Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. No party has objected to the R & R and the time period for filing objections has past. The R & R of the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties that failure to object to the R & R within fourteen days results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (ECF No. 28 at 7.) The Court has reviewed the R & R of the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the R & R of the Magistrate Judge and awards attorney’s fees to Plaintiff. The Clerk is DIRECTED to remove this action from the Court’s pending case list. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?