Glover v. Kirsher et al

Filing 44

ORDER finding as moot 40 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting 43 Report and Recommendations and Dismisses this action without prejudice. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 4/23/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BARNETT GLOVER, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:13-cv-976 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp v. DR. KIRSHER, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s April 2, 2015 Report and Recommendation. (ECF No. 43.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge cited Plaintiff’s failure to keep the Court advised of his current address and to respond to a March 5, 2015 Order as evidence of Plaintiff’s clear abandonment of this litigation. (Id. at Page ID # 282.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss this action without prejudice for failure to prosecute. (Id.) The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that a failure to file a timely objection would waive the right to de novo review by the undersigned and would waive the right to appeal the decision adopting the Report and Recommendation. (Id. at Page ID # 282-83.) No objections have been filed, the time for filing objections has expired, and the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning is correct. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DISMISSES this action WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to prosecute. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and terminate this case on the docket 1 records of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, Eastern Division. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?