Retail Service Systems, Inc. v. Carolina Bedding Direct, LLC et al

Filing 117

ORDER OF DEFAULT AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 2/24/15. (lvw1)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Retail Service Systems, Inc., Plaintiff, : Carolina Bedding Direct, LLC, et al., Defendants. Civil Action 2:13-cv-00994 : v. : Judge Smith : Magistrate Judge Abel : ORDER This matter is before the Court on plaintiff Retail Service System’s, Inc.’s January 20, 2015 motion for default judgment against Carolina Bedding Direct ,LLC (doc. 114). Pursuant to Rule 55(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, plaintiff Retail Service Systems, Inc. (“RSS”) is entitled to a default judgment against defendant Carolina Bedding Direct, LLC (“Carolina Bedding (NC)”), in an amount to be determined at a damages hearing. Defendant has not filed a responsive pleading or otherwise appeared in this matter, and Defendant’s time both to file an answer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(1)(A)(i) and to retain new counsel in this matter pursuant to this Court’s order (ECF No. 107) has expired. Accordingly, RSS applied to the Clerk of Court for entry of default against Carolina Bedding (NC), and the Clerk entered that default on December 5, 2014. (See ECF Nos. 111-112). 1 Accordingly, the Motion of Plaintiff Retail Service Systems, Inc. for Default Judgment Against Defendant Carolina Bedding Direct, LLC (doc. 114) is hereby GRANTED, and a Default Judgment against Defendant Carolina Bedding is to be ENTERED. Further, the Court GRANTS a permanent injunction enjoining Carolina Bedding (NC) from the use of RSS’s trade secrets and proprietary materials. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ George C. Smith GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?