Orrand et al v. Deer Creek Excavating LLC

Filing 23

ORDER adopting 21 Report and Recommendations. Signed by Judge James L Graham on 12/23/2014. (ds)(This document has been sent by the Clerks Office by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 12/23/2014 (er1).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Raymond Orrand, Administrator, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Case No. 2:13-cv-1121 Deer Creek Excavating, LLC, Defendant. ORDER This is an action brought pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §§185 and 1132 by the administrator and trustees of the Ohio Operating Engineers Health and Welfare Plan, the Ohio Operating Engineers Pension Fund, the Ohio Operating Engineers Apprenticeship and Training Fund and the Ohio Operating Engineers Safety & Education Fund to recover contributions allegedly owed to the funds by defendant Deer Creek Excavating, LLC, a corporation with its principal place of business in Bellville, Ohio. Plaintiffs seek recovery of unpaid contributions, liquidated damages, interest, attorney’s fees, court costs and injunctive relief. This matter is before the court for consideration of the December 1, 2014, report and recommendation of the magistrate judge regarding plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20) filed on November 7, 2014. summary judgment. Defendant did not respond to the motion for The magistrate judge recommended plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be granted. 4-5. that Doc. 21, pp. The magistrate judge noted that plaintiffs had submitted uncontroverted contributions evidence to the that funds, defendant as failed required to under make a timely collective bargaining agreement, for the periods from November 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, and from January 1, 2013, through April 30, 2013, in an amount totaling $15,342.10. Doc. 21, pp. 2-3. magistrate plaintiffs judge further concluded that were The also entitled to an award of liquidated damages and interest, as well as attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. Doc. 21, pp. 3-4. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the report and recommendation within fourteen days would result in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” Doc. 21, p. 5. The time period for filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and no party has objected to the report and recommendation. The court has reviewed the report and recommendation, and agrees with the findings and conclusions of the magistrate judge. The court adopts the report and recommendation (Doc. 21). plaintiffs’ granted. motion for summary judgment (Doc. 20) is The hereby The clerk is directed to enter judgment in favor of the plaintiffs. Plaintiffs are hereby awarded: 1. $15,342.10 in unpaid contributions from November 1, 2012, through April 30, 2013, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(A); 2. $4,753.56 in interest, calculated to November 15, 2014, plus $7.57 per day thereafter, so long as the judgment remains unpaid, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1132(g)(2)(B); 3. $4,753.56 in liquidated damages, calculated to November 15, 2014, plus $7.57 per day thereafter, so long as the judgment remains unpaid, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(C); 4. Court costs in the amount of $400.00, pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D); 2 5. Reasonable attorney’s fees pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(D), in an amount to be determined by the court; and 6. Injunctive relief pursuant to 29 U.S.C. §1132(g)(2)(E); specifically, Deer Creek Excavating, LLC, is hereby directed to comply with its contribution and audit obligations under the various agreements set forth in pages 11-13 of the complaint (Doc. 1). It is further ordered that plaintiffs shall file a properly supported motion for attorney’s fees within fourteen days of the date of this order. Date: December 23, 2014 s/James L. Graham James L. Graham United States District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?