Payne et al v. Pummill et al

Filing 18

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C Smith on 1/23/14. (lvw1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION LOWELL N. PAYNE, JR., Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:13-cv-1172 JUDGE SMITH Magistrate Judge Abel CATHY PUMMILL, et al., Defendants. ORDER On November 22, 2013, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiffs’ Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. It was further recommended that Plaintiff Payne’s Motion for Certification of a Class Action be DENIED because pro se prisoners are not qualified to adequately represent a class. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 5). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff Payne’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (See Doc. 8). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The objections present the same issues presented to and considered by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff objects to the Magistrate Judge’s characterization of him and his fellow inmates as prisoners. He asserts they are “detainee’s being held unlawfully at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution.” (Doc. 8 at 1). However, as the Magistrate Judge thoroughly discussed in the Report and Recommendation, “a complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’ Twombly, 550 U.S. at 570.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). Plaintiff, whether identified as a prison or detainee has failed to sufficiently state a claim for relief. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are without merit and are hereby OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation, Document 5, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs’ Complaint is hereby dismissed in its entirety. Further, Plaintiff’s other pending motions for certification, default judgment, summary judgment and reconsideration are DENIED AS MOOT. The Clerk shall remove Documents2, 3, 5, 14 AND 15 from the Court’s pending motions list. The Clerk shall terminate this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ George C. Smith__________________ GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?