Winkle v. Sargus et al

Filing 15

ORDER re 14 Notice of Appeal filed by Mark R Winkle. The Court hereby CERTIFIES that Plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 4/10/14. (kn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION MARK R. WINKLE, Plaintiff, Case No. 2:14-cv-0003 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST Magistrate Judge Norah M. King v. EDMUND A. SARGUS, et al., Defendants. ORDER Plaintiff Mark R. Winkle is a pro se litigant seeking monetary and other damages for an alleged conspiracy. On January 6, 2014, Plaintiff moved for leave to proceed with this case in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 4.) The Magistrate Judge granted Plaintiff’s request. (ECF No. 8.) On January 10, 2014, the Magistrate Judge recommended that this case be dismissed (“R&R”). (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff objected to the R&R. (ECF No. 10.) After considering those objections and conducting a de novo review of the R&R, the Court adopted the R&R and dismissed Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 12.) Plaintiff now appeals the Court’s order adopting the R&R and dismissing this case. (ECF No. 14.) Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a), an appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing that it is not taken in good faith. See also Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). For the reasons set forth in the R&R and the Court’s March 13, 2014 Opinion & Order adopting the R&R, the Court hereby CERTIFIES that Plaintiff’s appeal is not taken in good faith. There exists no reasonable basis for any claims of alleged error. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?