Victoria's Secret Stores Brand Management, Inc. et al v. Fragrance Acquisitions, LLC et al.

Filing 30

ORDER construes Notice of voluntary dismissal as motion. The Court thefore GRANTS the Motion and Dismisses without prejudice all claims against Izriel Polatsk aka Ezriel Polatsek. Signed by Judge Gregory L Frost on 4/30/14. (kn)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION VICTORIA’S SECRET STORES BRAND MANAGEMENT, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:14-cv-139 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King v. FRAGRANCE ACQUISITIONS, LLC, et al., Defendants. ORDER On April 29, 2014, Plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal without prejudice of all claims against Defendant Izriel Polatsek a/k/a Ezriel Polatsek. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiffs purport to take this action under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i); however, the Sixth Circuit has held that Rule 41 is confined to the dismissal of an entire action and cannot provide a mechanism through which select parties or claims can be dismissed. Letherer v. Alger Group, L.L.C., 328 F.3d 262, 266 (6th Cir. 2003), recognized as overruled on other grounds in Blackburn v. Oaktree Capital Mgmt., LLC, 511 F.3d 633, 636 (6th Cir. 2008); see also AmSouth Bank v. Dale, 386 F.3d 763, 778 (6th Cir. 2004) (citing Letherer); Coleman v. Ohio State Univ. Med. Ctr., No. 2:11-cv-49, 2011 WL 3273531, at *6 (S.D. Ohio Aug. 1, 2011). Recognizing that filings are to be construed by their substantive content and not by their labels, the Court construes the motion as one under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 or Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 21. This Court therefore GRANTS the motion and DISMISSES WITHOUT PREJUDICE all claims against Izriel Polatsek a/k/a Ezriel Polatsek. 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?