Bowen v. Starbucks Coffee Company et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Compel. If plaintiff has not already done so, plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to defendants written discovery within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Mark R. Abel on 02/17/2015. (sr1)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Maria Bowen, : Plaintiff Starbucks Coffee Company, et al., Defendants Civil Action 2:14-cv-00365 : v. : Judge Frost : Magistrate Judge Abel : Order Defendant Starbuck Corporation’s unopposed January 9, 2015 motion to compel discovery and for sanctions (doc. 15) is GRANTED. Defendant served written discovery August 22, 2104. As of the time defendant filed the motion to compel, plaintiff had not responded to defendant’s written discovery. Defendant shall serve plaintiff’s counsel with a statement of the legal services rendered to prepare the motion within 14 days of the date of this Order. If plaintiff contests the reasonableness of those fees, she must file a request for a hearing to determine the reasonableness of the fees request within 14 days of receiving defendant’s statement. If plaintiff has not already done so, plaintiff is ORDERED to respond to defendant’s written discovery within 14 days of the date of this Order. Non-dispositive notice right appeal Under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §636(b)(1)(A), Rule 72(a), Fed. R. Civ. P., and Eastern Division Order No. 91-3, pt. F, 5, either party may, within fourteen (14) days after this Order is filed, file and serve on the opposing party a motion for reconsideration by the District Judge. The motion must specifically designate the Order, or part thereof, in question and the basis for any objection thereto. The District Judge, upon consideration of the motion, shall set aside any part of this Order found to be clearly erroneous or contrary to law. s/Mark R. Abel United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?