Haller v. Warden London Correctional Institution
OPINION and ORDER adopting and affirming 23 the Report and Recommendation; denying 24 Petitioner's Motion for Verification. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 3/8/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CASE NO. 2:14-cv-373
JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON
MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP
OPINION AND ORDER
On January 10,2017, the Magistrate Judge Issued a Report and
Recommendation recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas
corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed, EOF No. 23. Although the
parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge's Report and
Recommendation, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections
have been filed.
The objections were due on January 24, 2017. On March 1, 2017,
Petitioner filed a Motion Requesting that the Court Verify the Docket Number of
Each Document Enclosed Herein, in which he has attached the Affidavit of
Joshua R. Nailer, the Affidavit of James Gibson, and what purports to be a gun
receipt from "Vandalia Tactical." EOF No. 24, PagelD# 868. Petitioner submits
such documents, which apparently are already a part of the record, in support of
his claim that the evidence was constitutionally insufficient to sustain his
convictions. However, Petitioner has not submitted any objections to the
Magistrate Judge's recommendation of dismissai of this action, and any
objections would now be untimely.
The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 23, is ADOPTED and
AFFIRIMED. Petitioner's motion for verification, ECF No. 24, is DENIED. This
action is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
liCHAEL H. WATSON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?