Hughes et al v. Gulf Interstate Field Services, Inc.

Filing 100

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION; claims of opt-in Plaintiffs Mark Cameron and Herman Liggett are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 1/14/16. (aq)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TOM HUGHES, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 2:14-cv-432 CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. v. Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers GULF INTERSTATE FIELD SERVICES, INC., Defendant. ORDER On December 9,2015, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation in this case recommending that the Court dismiss the claims of opt-in Plaintiffs Mark Cameron and Herman Liggett with prejudice for failure to prosecute pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) (ECF No. 95). The Report and Recommendation advised the parties that failure to objectwithin fourteen days wouldresult in a waiverof review. The time period for objections has run and no party has objected to the Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED. The claims of opt-in Plaintiffs Mark Cameron and Herman Liggett are hereby DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. AtS^ DATE EDMUND'A. SXRGUS, JR. UNI'EED.SIATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?