Tackett v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
13
ORDER adopting 12 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 9/4/15. (jk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Dina Joanne Tackett,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:14-cv-970
Commissioner of Social Security,
Judge Michael H. Watson
Defendant.
ORDER
On August 17,2015, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom
this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and General Order
14-01 for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and
Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Dina Joanne Tackett's
("Plaintiff") Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 12.
Judge Deavers recommended that the Court reverse the Commissioner's nondisability finding and remand the case to the Commissioner and the
Administrative Law Judge ("ALT) pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C.
§ 405(g) for further fact finding and clarification of the ALJ's findings at step
three. Id. at 17.
Judge Deavers notified the parties of their right to file objections to the
R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Id. at 17. Judge Deavers also
specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within
fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the
District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting
the R&R. Id. at 18. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no
objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED, and the case is
remanded to the Commissioner and the ALJ.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
IICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?