Prim v. Jackson

Filing 29

ORDER adopting 17 the Report and Recommendation in case 2:14-cv-01219-MHW-TPK; adopting 14 the Report and Recommendation in case 2:14-cv-02099-MHW-TPK. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 5/4/15. Associated Cases: 2:14-cv-01219-MHW-TPK, 2:14-cv-02099-MHW-TPK (jk)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Jesse Prim, Case No. 2:14-cv-1219 Plaintiff, v. Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Kemp Dr. Wanza Jackson, Defendant. Lambert Dehler, Case No. 2:14-cv-2099 Plaintiff, v. Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Kemp Gary C. Mohr, eta/., Defendants. ORDER On March 16, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Kemp issued a Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Defendants Gary C. Mohr's and Jerry Spatny's motion to dismiss Plaintiff Lambert Dehler's complaint in this consolidated prisoner civil rights action. ECF No. 14. Judge Kemp recommended that the motion to dismiss be granted in part and denied in part. /d. at 10. Specifically, he recommended that the claims against Defendant Jerry Spatny in his individual capacity be dismissed and the remainder of the motion to dismiss be denied. /d. Judge Kemp notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1 ). /d. at 10-11. Judge Kemp also specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. /d. at 11. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?