Ray v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
17
ORDER adopting 16 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 6/29/15. (jk)
--
-----------~----~---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Cathy A. Ray,
Plaintiff,
v.
Case No. 2:14-cv-1362
Judge Michael H. Watson
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
ORDER
On June 8, 2015, United States Magistrate Judge Kemp, to whom this
case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(8) and General Order 14-01
for the Southern District of Ohio Eastern Division, filed a Report and
Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Cathy A. Ray's
("Plaintiff') Statement of Specific Errors in this Social Security case. ECF No. 16.
Judge Kemp recommended that Plaintiff's Statement of Specific Errors be
sustained to the extent that the case be remanded to the Commissioner pursuant
to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), sentence four. /d. at 11.
Judge Kemp notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1 ). /d. Judge Kemp also specifically advised the
parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a
waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to
appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. /d. at 12. The
deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed.
Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED, and the case is
remanded to the Commissioner.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?