Hendricks et al v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections et al

Filing 28

ORDER ADOPTING 27 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Mailed copy of 27 to Benjamin Hendricks, 3024 Fairview Blvd, Fairview, TN 37062 by Regular U.S. Mail. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 3/6/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

BENJAMIN HENDRICKS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:14-cv-01841
JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

v.

OHIO DEPARTMENT OF REHABILITATION
AND CORRECTIONS, et al.,
Defendants.

OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s February 13,
2015 Order and Report and Recommendation (“Order and R&R”). (ECF No. 27.) In that filing,
the Magistrate Judge recommended that Plaintiff Hendricks’ claims for injunctive relief be
dismissed as moot because Plaintiff Hendricks has been released from PCI.
The Order and R&R advised the parties that, “[i]f any party seeks review by the District
Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and
serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically designating this
Report and Recommendation, and the part in question, as well as the basis for the objection.”
(ECF No. 27, at 8.) The Order and R&R specifically advised the parties that their failure to
object would “result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver
of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Id. (citing Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex

Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) and United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984
(6th Cir. 2005)).)
The Court has reviewed the Order and R&R. Noting that no objections have been filed,
that the time for filing such objections has expired, and that the Magistrate Judge’s reasoning is
correct, the Court ADOPTS and AFFIRMS the Order and R&R and DISMISSES AS MOOT
Plaintiff Hendricks’ claims for injunctive relief.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2