State of Ohio, ex rel., Michael DeWine, Ohio Attorney General v. Superior Fibers, Inc. et al

Filing 89

ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 86 in that 80 Plaintiff's Motion for Default Judgment is DENIED and this Court sua sponte dismisses Defendant Superior Fibers, Inc. for failure to timely effect service of process. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 1/2/18. (sem)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION STATE OF OHIO, ex rel., MICHAEL DEWINE, OHIO ATTORNEY GENERAL, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:14-cv-1843 JUDGE SMITH Magistrate Judge Vascura SUPERIOR FIBERS, INC., et al., Defendants. ORDER On December 7, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment be denied and that the Court sua sponte dismiss Defendant Superior Fibers, Inc. for failure to timely effect service of process. (Doc. 86). The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Report and Recommendation. On December 21, 2017, Plaintiff filed a notice with the Court noting the agreement to dismissal of Defendant Superior Fibers, Inc. with prejudice. (See Doc. 87). Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Motion for Default Judgment (Doc. 80) is hereby DENIED. Defendant Superior Fibers, Inc. is hereby dismissed with prejudice for failure to timely effect service of process. The Clerk shall remove Documents 80 and 86 from the Court’s pending motions list, dismiss Defendant Superior Fibers, Inc., and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ George C. Smith__________________ GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?