Van Steenis v. Holder et al
Filing
9
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING this action pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2) for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/27/2015. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
JURGEN VAN STEENIS,
Plaintiff,
Civil Action 2:14-cv-2013
Judge Algenon L. Marbley
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the November 12, 2014, Report and
Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 6.) The Magistrate Judge
recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for lack
of jurisdiction.
In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties
that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a
“waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the
judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 6, ECF No. 6.) The time period
for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected
to the Report and Recommendation.
The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections
have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the
Report
and Recommendation (ECF No. 6.) and DISMISSES this action pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2)
for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Algenon L. Marbley
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DATED: January 27, 2015
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?