Van Steenis v. Holder et al

Filing 9

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DISMISSING this action pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2) for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 1/27/2015. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION JURGEN VAN STEENIS, Plaintiff, Civil Action 2:14-cv-2013 Judge Algenon L. Marbley Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers v. ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the November 12, 2014, Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (ECF No. 6.) The Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) for lack of jurisdiction. In the Report and Recommendation, the Magistrate Judge specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the Report and Recommendation within fourteen days results in a “waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Report and Recommendation 6, ECF No. 6.) The time period for filing objections to the Report and Recommendation has expired. Plaintiff has not objected to the Report and Recommendation. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation. Noting that no objections have been filed and that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 6.) and DISMISSES this action pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2) for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk is DIRECTED to enter judgment accordingly. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Algenon L. Marbley ALGENON L. MARBLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DATED: January 27, 2015 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?