Kiker v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation
Filing
137
ORDER - The Court construes 136 Motion to File Document Under Seal as seeking leave to file redacted versions of responses on the public record. Plaintiffs shall file redacted versions of their responses (Docs 115 , 116 , and 117 ) within three days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 11/17/2016. (agm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Kathryn Kiker,
:
Plaintiff,
v.
:
:Case No. 2:14-cv-2164
:CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.
Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Magistrate Judge Kemp
Defendant.
:
ORDER
Plaintiffs have moved for leave to file under seal their
responses to three motions filed by defendants, including the
Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert Ra-Id
Abdulla, M.D.; the Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of
Plaintiffs’ Expert Laura M. Plunkett, PhD; and the Motion for
Summary Judgment.
According to the Court’s docket, plaintiffs
were previously granted such leave by order dated May 18, 2016
(Doc. 114), and subsequently filed these documents under seal
(Docs. 115, 116, and 117).
Consequently, the Court construes
the current motion as seeking leave to file redacted versions of
these responses on the public record.
Plaintiffs have described
their proposed redactions as: (1) confidential patient-health
information including the medical condition for which Plaintiff
was prescribed Paxil; (2) the names and identifying information
of minors; and (3) information that invades the privacy interests
of third parties.
The motion sets forth good cause and the
motion (Doc. 136) is therefore granted.
Plaintiffs shall file
redacted versions of their responses (Docs. 115, 116, and 117)
within three days of the date of this order.
/s/ Terence P. Kemp
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?