Kiker v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation

Filing 137

ORDER - The Court construes 136 Motion to File Document Under Seal as seeking leave to file redacted versions of responses on the public record. Plaintiffs shall file redacted versions of their responses (Docs 115 , 116 , and 117 ) within three days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp on 11/17/2016. (agm)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Kathryn Kiker, : Plaintiff, v. : :Case No. 2:14-cv-2164 :CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. Smithkline Beecham Corporation, Magistrate Judge Kemp Defendant. : ORDER Plaintiffs have moved for leave to file under seal their responses to three motions filed by defendants, including the Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert Ra-Id Abdulla, M.D.; the Motion to Exclude Opinion Testimony of Plaintiffs’ Expert Laura M. Plunkett, PhD; and the Motion for Summary Judgment. According to the Court’s docket, plaintiffs were previously granted such leave by order dated May 18, 2016 (Doc. 114), and subsequently filed these documents under seal (Docs. 115, 116, and 117). Consequently, the Court construes the current motion as seeking leave to file redacted versions of these responses on the public record. Plaintiffs have described their proposed redactions as: (1) confidential patient-health information including the medical condition for which Plaintiff was prescribed Paxil; (2) the names and identifying information of minors; and (3) information that invades the privacy interests of third parties. The motion sets forth good cause and the motion (Doc. 136) is therefore granted. Plaintiffs shall file redacted versions of their responses (Docs. 115, 116, and 117) within three days of the date of this order. /s/ Terence P. Kemp United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?