DSM Desotech, Inc. et al v. MOMENTIVE SPECIALTY CHEMICALS INC. et al

Filing 42

ORDER adopting 38 the Report and Recommendation; denying without prejudice 18 Momentive UV Coating's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; granting 23 Plaintiffs' Motion for Discovery. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/14/15. (jk)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DSM Desotech, Inc., etal., Plaintiffs, v. Momentive Specialty Chemicals, Inc., et a/., Case No. 2:15-cv-70 Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Deavers Defendants. ORDER On November 24, 2015, Magistrate Judge Deavers issued a report and recommendation ("R&R") regarding Momentive UV Coatings (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.'s ("MUV") motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, Plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery, and MUV's motion to stay discovery. R&R, ECF No. 38. Magistrate Judge Deavers recommended that MUV's motion to dismiss be denied without prejudice to renewal following jurisdictional discovery, that Plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery be granted, and that MUV's motion to stay be denied. Id. at 22-23. Magistrate Judge Deavers further recommended that the Court set February 29, 2016 as the deadline for completion of jurisdictional discovery and March 15, 2016 as the deadline for MUV to file a renewed motion to dismiss. Id. Magistrate Judge Deavers notified the parties of their right to file objections to the R&R pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1). Id. at 23. She also specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the R&R within fourteen days would result in a waiver of both the right to de novo review by the District Judge and the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the R&R. Id. The deadline for filing such objections has passed, and no objections were filed. Having received no objections, the R&R is ADOPTED. MUV's motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18, is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE to renewal following jurisdictional discovery. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct jurisdictional discovery, ECF No. 23, is GRANTED. MUV's motion to stay, ECF No. 30, is DENIED. Additionally, discovery on the issue of personal jurisdiction must be completed by February 29,2016, and MUV may file a renewed motion to dismiss by March 15,2016. IT IS SO ORDERED. iPou^^] ICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Case No. 2:15-cv-70 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?