Horn v. Hunt
ORDER granting (47) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; adopting Report and Recommendations re (52) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:15-cv-00220-JLG-TPK; granting (37) Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; adopting Report and Reco mmendations re (42) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:15-cv-03019-JLG-TPK. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 2/28/2017. Associated Cases: 2:15-cv-00220-JLG-TPK, 2:15-cv-03019-JLG-TPK (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Case No. 2:15-cv-220
Aaron E. Young,
Case No. 2:15-cv-3019
This matter is before the court for consideration of the
report and recommendation of the magistrate judge filed on February
The magistrate judge recommended that Mr. Horn’s claims
(Case No. 2:15-cv-220) be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b) for failure to prosecute.
The report and recommendation
specifically advised the parties that the failure to object to the
report and recommendation within fourteen days “will result in a
waiver of the right to have the district judge review the Report
and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the
right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the
Report and Recommendation.”
Doc. 52, p. 3.
The time period for
filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and
no objections have been filed.
The court adopts the report and recommendation (Doc. 42 in
Case No. 2:15-cv-3019, Doc. 52 in Case No. 2:15-cv-220).
motion to dismiss for failure to prosecute (Doc. 37 in Case No.
2:15-cv-3019, Doc. 47 in Case No. 2:15-cv-220) is granted.
Horn’s claims this case are hereby dismissed without prejudice for
failure to prosecute. The clerk is directed to enter a judgment of
dismissal without prejudice in Case No. 2:15-cv-220.
Date: February 28, 2017
s/James L. Graham
James L. Graham
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?