Robison v. Coey et al
ORDER granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 76 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/2/2017. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
David A. Robison,
Case No. 2:15-cv-944
Woody Coey, et al.,
This matter is before the court for consideration of the
report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge on February
The magistrate judge recommended that defendants’ motion
for summary judgment on the initial retaliation claim contained in
the original complaint be granted.
The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties
that objections to the report and recommendation were due within
fourteen days, and that the failure to object to the report and
recommendation “will result in a waiver of the right to have the
District Judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and
also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of
the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.”
76, p. 19.
The time period for filing objections to the report and
recommendation has expired, and no objections to the report and
recommendation have been filed.
The report and recommendation (Doc. 76) is adopted.
reasons set forth in the report and recommendation, the motion for
summary judgment on plaintiff’s initial retaliation claim (Doc. 61)
The motion for summary judgment (Doc. 77) on the
additional retaliation claim advanced in the amended complaint
It is so ordered.
Date: March 2, 2017
s/James L. Graham
James L. Graham
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?