Robison v. Coey et al

Filing 78

ORDER granting 61 Motion for Summary Judgment; adopting Report and Recommendations re 76 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/2/2017. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
David A. Robison,
Plaintiff,
v.

Case No. 2:15-cv-944

Woody Coey, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the court for consideration of the
report and recommendation filed by the magistrate judge on February
2, 2017.

The magistrate judge recommended that defendants’ motion

for summary judgment on the initial retaliation claim contained in
the original complaint be granted.
The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties
that objections to the report and recommendation were due within
fourteen days, and that the failure to object to the report and
recommendation “will result in a waiver of the right to have the
District Judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and
also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of
the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.”
76, p. 19.

Doc.

The time period for filing objections to the report and

recommendation has expired, and no objections to the report and
recommendation have been filed.
The report and recommendation (Doc. 76) is adopted.

For the

reasons set forth in the report and recommendation, the motion for
summary judgment on plaintiff’s initial retaliation claim (Doc. 61)
is granted.

The motion for summary judgment (Doc. 77) on the

additional retaliation claim advanced in the amended complaint

remains pending.
It is so ordered.

Date: March 2, 2017

s/James L. Graham
James L. Graham
United States District Judge

2