Boards of Trustees of Ohio Laborers' Fringe Benefit Programs v. McVay Masonry, LLC

Filing 10

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. It is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment, ECF 9 , be GRANTED. Objections to R&R due by 7/13/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Norah McCann King on 6/26/2015. (pes)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BOARDS OF TRUSTEES OF THE OHIO LABORERS’ FRINGE BENEFIT PROGRAMS, Plaintiffs, vs. Civil Action 2:15-CV-1126 Judge Marbley Magistrate Judge King MCVAY MASONRY, LLC. Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This is an action for unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, and interest allegedly owed certain employee benefits plans pursuant to a collective bargaining agreement. Plaintiffs, the trustees of four trust funds, assert claims under ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1132, and the LMRA, 29 U.S.C. § 185. Defendant McVay Masonry, LLC (“defendant”), was served with a summons and a copy of the Complaint on April 14, 2015, see ECF 3, but has failed to plead or otherwise defend this action. Plaintiff applied to the Clerk for entry of default, Plaintiffs’ Application for Entry of Default against Defendant, ECF 6, and the Clerk entered default pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(a) on June 22, 2015. Entry of Default, ECF 7. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, ECF 9. Plaintiffs have established that defendant entered into an agreement with a local union affiliated with the Laborers’ District Council of Ohio, AFL-CIO, by which defendant agreed to pay 1 contributions to the funds, by the 15th of each month, on behalf of its employees working within the work jurisdiction of the union. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, Exhibits A, B. The Affidavit of Plaintiffs’ Contractor Relations Manager, attached to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment as ECF 9-2, establishes that defendant owes $3,586.81 in unpaid fringe benefit contributions for the period February 2014 through April 2015. Default Judgment, Exhibit C. Id. at ¶ 3; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Plaintiffs are entitled to liquidated damages, interest, and attorney fees on these unpaid contributions. 29 U.S.C. § 1132(g)(2); Mich. Carpenters Council Health & Welfare Fund v. C.J. Rogers, Inc., 933 F.2d 376 (6th Cir. 1991). Plaintiffs have established that defendant owes $889.31 in liquidated damages and interest on the unpaid contributions through April 2015. Affidavit of Plaintiffs’ Contractor Relations Manager, ¶ 3; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, Exhibit C. Plaintiffs seek an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,040.00, for eight attorney hours billed at the rate of $255 per hour. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, p. 4, Exhibit D. Plaintiffs have provided evidentiary support that the number of hours billed and the hourly rate charged are reasonable. Plaintiffs’ Affidavit in Support of Their Motion for Default Judgment, attached to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment as ECF 9-1; Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, Exhibit D. Plaintiffs are therefore entitled to judgment in the amount of $4,476.12 in unpaid fringe benefit contributions, liquidated damages, 2 and prejudgment interest, and an award of attorney’s fees in the amount of $2,040. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default Judgment, ECF 9, be GRANTED. It is FURTHER RECOMMENDED that the Clerk enter judgment against defendant and that plaintiffs Boards of Trustees of the Ohio Laborers’ Fringe Benefit Programs have and recover from McVay Masonry, LLC, the sum of Four Thousand Four Hundred Seventy-Six Dollars and Twelve Cents ($4,476.12), including unpaid fringe benefit contributions through April 2015, prejudgment interest, and liquidated damages, and a reasonable attorney’s fee in the amount of Two Thousand Forty Dollars ($2,040), plus interest from the date of judgment at the rate of one percent (1%) per month. If any party seeks review by the District Judge of this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to the Report and Recommendation, specifically designating this Report and Recommendation, and the part thereof in question, as well as the basis for objection thereto. U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). 28 Response to objections must be filed within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy thereof. Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Smith v. Detroit Fed’n of Teachers, Local 231 etc., 829 F.2d 1370 (6th Cir. 1987); United States 3 v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). June 26, 2015 s/Norah McCann King_______ Norah McCann King United States Magistrate Judge 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?