Hall v. Commissioner of Social Security
Filing
18
ORDER adopting 17 the Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff's statement of errors is OVERRULED, and the Commissioner's finding is AFFIRMED. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 2/10/17. (jk) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
V'*
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Brad Hall,
Plaintiff,
V.
Case No. 2:15-cv-1206
Commissioner of Social Security,
Judge Michael H. Watson
Defendant.
ORDER
On January 24,2017, United States Magistrate Judge Deavers, to whom
this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Generai Order
14-01 for the Southem District of Ohio Eastern Division of Coiumbus, fiied a
Report and Recommendation ("R&R") concerning the disposition of Brad Mali's
("PiaintifT) Compiaint in this Social Security case. The R&R recommended
overruiing PiaintifTs statement of errors and affirming the decision of the
Commissioner of Sociai Security.
The R&R notified Piaintiff of his right to fiie objections to the R&R pursuant
to 26 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Federai Ruie of Civii Procedure 72(b). The R&R
further specificaiiy advised Piaintiff that the faiiure to object to the R&R within
fourteen days wouid resuit in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the
District Judge and waiver of the right to appeai the decision of the District Court.
R&R 8, ECF No. 17. The deadiine for fiiing such objections has passed, and no
objections were fiied.
-<•
Having received no objections, the R&R Is ADOPTED. The PlaintifTs
statement of errors Is OVERRULED, and the Commissioner's finding is
AFFIRMED. The Clerk shall enter final judgment for defendant and terminate
this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?