McCain v. Jenkins et al
Filing
129
ORDER AND ENTRY TERMINATING THE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (DOC. 95 ) ON THE DOCKET. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman on 1/17/2019. (srb)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
MICHAEL D. MCCAIN, SR.,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:15-cv-1262
vs.
CHAROLETTE JENKINS, et al.,
District Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Michael J. Newman
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________
ORDER AND ENTRY TERMINATING THE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS
(DOC. 95) ON THE DOCKET
______________________________________________________________________
On August 6, 2018, the undersigned ordered that Defendants could
supplement their motion for judgment on the pleadings (doc. 95) with a
motion for summary judgment.
Doc. 104.
Defendants did so by filing a
motion for summary judgment on September 6, 2018.
Doc. 110.
The motion
for summary judgment remains pending on the Court’s docket.1
In their motion for summary judgment, Defendants incorporated by
reference all of the arguments made in the motion for judgment on the
pleadings.
Id.
Because the undersigned will address the merits of the
arguments asserted by Defendants in their motion for judgment on the
pleadings in a Report and Recommendation on the motion for summary
judgment, the undersigned ORDERS that the motion for judgment on the
pleadings (doc. 95) be terminated on the Court’s docket.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: January 17, 2019
s/ Michael J. Newman
Michael J. Newman
United States Magistrate Judge
1 Pro se Plaintiff has not yet filed a memorandum in opposition to either
the motion for judgment on the pleadings or the motion for summary judgment,
and the undersigned, by separate entry, has issued an Order directing him to
show cause for such failure on or before January 28, 2019.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?