Cleare v. Jenkins et al

Filing 9

ORDER adopting 6 Report and Recommendations and Dismisses Plaintiff's claims related to his request for a criminal investigation and charges against Defendant. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 8/11/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
RODERIK CLEARE,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:15-cv-2295
JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

v.
CHAROLETTE JENKINS, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Order and
Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated July 13, 2015. (ECF No. 6.) In the R&R, the
Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims related to his request for
a criminal investigation and charges against Defendant. The Magistrate Judge found that
Plaintiff could proceed with his remaining claims at this juncture, and ordered the United States
Marshal to serve Defendants.
The R&R advised the parties that, “[i]f any party seeks review by the District Judge of
this [R&R], that party may within fourteen (14) days, file and serve on all parties objections to
the [R&R], and the part in question, as well as the basis for objections.” (ECF No. 6, at PAGEID
# 33–34.) The R&R specifically advised the parties “that the failure to object to the [R&R] will
result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to
appeal the judgment of the District Court.” (Id. at PAGEID # 34 (citing Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex
Prod. Co., 517 F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) and United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984
(6th Cir. 2005)).)

1 

The Court has reviewed the R&R. Noting that no objections have been filed, and that the
time period for filing objections has expired, the Court hereby ADOPTS AND AFFIRMS the
R&R (ECF No. 6) and DISMISSES Plaintiff’s claims related to his request for a criminal
investigation and charges against Defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2