Stein v. Mohr et al

Filing 25

ORDER adopting 20 Report and Recommendations.; denying 9 Motion for TRO; denying 9 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 12/31/15. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
SAMUEL C. STEIN,
Plaintiff,

Case No. 2:15-cv-2681
JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers

v.
GARY MOHR, et al.,
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report
and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated November 30, 2015. (ECF No. 20.) In that filing,
the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court deny Plaintiff’s motion for temporary
restraining order and for preliminary injunction. (ECF No. 9.)
The R&R advised the parties that, if any party sought review by the District
Judge, that party may file objections to the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations within
fourteen (14) days. (ECF No. 20, at PAGEID # 125–26.) The R&R further advised the
parties that the failure to object within fourteen days would “result in a waiver of the right
to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of
the District Court.” (Id. at PAGEID # 126 (citing Pfahler v. Nat’l Latex Prod. Co., 517
F.3d 816, 829 (6th Cir. 2007) and United States v. Sullivan, 431 F.3d 976, 984 (6th Cir.
2005)).)
The Court has reviewed the R&R. Noting that no objections have been filed, and
that the time for filing such objections has expired, the Court AFFIRMS AND ADOPTS

1 

the R&R (ECF No. 20) and DENIES Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order
and for preliminary injunction (ECF No. 9).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ Gregory L. Frost
GREGORY L. FROST
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2