Shoop v. Mohr et al

Filing 10

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 11/25/15. (lvw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION FRANK RAY SHOOP, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:15-cv-2718 JUDGE SMITH Magistrate Judge Deavers GARY MOHR, et al., Defendants. ORDER On October 5, 2015, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation following the initial screen and recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants employed directly by the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction (collectively “the ODRC Defendants”) and transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division at Toledo. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 6). The parties were advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation. This matter is now before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation. (See Doc. 7). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). The objections present the same issues presented to and considered by the Magistrate Judge in the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff continues to argue that the ODRC Defendants have refused to investigate and respond to his grievance. He further asserts that they should not be dismissed nor should this case be transferred. However, he has not offered a sufficient basis for not dismissing the ODRC Defendants, nor for transferring the case. All of Plaintiff’s arguments have been carefully considered by the Magistrate Judge. Therefore, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that Plaintiff’s objections are without merit and are hereby OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation, Document 6, is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s claims against the ODRC Defendants are dismissed. The Clerk of this Court shall remove Document 6 from the Court’s pending motions list and shall transfer this case to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Western Division at Toledo. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ George C. Smith__________________ GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?