Davis v. Mohr et al

Filing 26

ORDER ADOPTING 23 Report and Recommendation; Plaintiff's Motions to supplement [16,17] are granted; Plaintiff's Motions for preliminary injunction [9,14] are denied; and Defendant's Motions to dismiss [11,15] are denied. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 7/7/16. (aq)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION

CARLTON DAVIS,

Plaintiff,

v.

Case No. 2:15-cv-2739
CHIEF JUDGE EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR.

Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp

GARY MOHR, et al.,
Defendants.

ORDER

On March 15,2016, the United States Magistrate Judge recommended (i) that Plaintiffs

motions to supplement [ECF Nos. 16,17] be granted, (ii) that Plaintiffs motions for preliminary
injunction [ECF Nos. 9,14] be denied, and (iii) that Defendants' motions to dismiss [ECF Nos.
11,15] be denied. (Report & Recommendation at 7 [ECF No. 23].) Plaintiff moved for and

received an extension of time—through June 1,2016—to file objections to the Report and
Recommendation. (Apr. 15,2016 Order at 1 [ECF No. 25].) Although the parties were advised

of their right to object to the recommendation, and of the consequences of their failure to do so,
there has been no objection.

Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 23] is ADOPTED AND
AFFIRMED. Plaintiffs motions to supplement [ECF Nos. 16,17] are GRANTED; Plaintiffs
motions for preliminary injunction [ECF Nos. 9,14] are DENIED; and Defendants' motions to
dismiss [ECF Nos. 11,15] are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

7-7- fcofl*

DATE

r\ S

EDlYj&Np A. SARGUS, JR.
JNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE