Wolfe v. Albrecht et al
Filing
48
ORDER adopting #46 the Report and Recommendation. Signed by Judge Michael H. Watson on 12/19/16. (jk)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
Michael Wolfe,
Plaintiff,
Case No. 2:15-cv-2773
V.
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Jolson
Richard Albrecht, et at.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Magistrate Judge
Jolson's Report and Recommendation ("R&R") dated October 4, 2016. EOF No.
46. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Jolson recommended that the Court remand
this action to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas because the additional
defendants added in Plaintiffs amended complaint destroyed diversity and
therefore deprived this Court of subject matter Jurisdiction. See id. at 3 (citing 28
U.S.C.A. ยง 1447(c)).
The R&R advised the parties that any party may object to Magistrate
Judge Jolson's recommendation within fourteen days of the date on which the
R&R was filed. Id. at 3. The R&R specifically advised the parties that the
"[fjailure to object to the [R&R] will result In a waiver of the rightto have the
districtJudge review the [R&R] de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the
right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the [R&R]." Id. at 4
(citing Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140,152-53 (1985)).
More than fourteen days have elapsed since the date of the R&R. Neither
party has objected. As such, the Court hereby ADOPTS the R&R and
REMANDS this case to the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL H. WATSON, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case No. 2:15-cv-2773
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?