Marshall v. Warden Pickaway Correctional Institution

Filing 23

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This case is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 9/28/2016. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION KENNETH ADAM MARSHALL, CASE NO. 2:15-CV-02775 JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KEMP Petitioner, v. WARDEN, PICKAWAY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Respondent. OPINION AND ORDER On August 31, 2016, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation and Order recommending that the instant petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254 be dismissed without prejudice to Petitioner’s ability to pursue relief against the appropriate Indiana officials should he find himself to be in custody under the warrants at issue in this case. The Order and Report and Recommendation also resolved various motions that have been filed by Petitioner in regard to this case. (ECF No. 21.) Although the parties were advised of the right to object to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Order, and of the consequences of failing to do so, no objections have been filed. The docket indicates that notification of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Order was returned as not deliverable and unable to forward (see ECF No. 22); however, it is the Petitioner’s responsibility to keep the Court advised of his current whereabouts. Therefore, the Report and Recommendation and Order (ECF No. 21) is ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. All pending motions shall be removed from the docket as indicated in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and Order. This action is hereby DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/Algenon L. Marbley ALGENON L. MARBLEY United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?