Bostic Senior v. Davis et al

Filing 5

ORDER finding as moot 3 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge Gregory L. Frost on 4/19/16. (kn)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION TEDDY GLEN BOSTIC SENIOR, Case No. 2:15-cv-3029 JUDGE GREGORY L. FROST Magistrate Judge Terence P. Kemp Plaintiff, v. JEANETTE ARLENE DAVIS, et al., Defendants. ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) dated February 29, 2016. (ECF No. 3.) In that filing, the Magistrate Judge recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) with leave to amend. Plaintiff did not object to the R&R; however, he filed an amended complaint within thirty days of the R&R. The amended complaint moots the R&R. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to remove the R&R from the Court’s list of pending filings. (ECF No. 3.) The R&R states: “[The] amended complaint, like the present one, will . . . be reviewed to see if it is sufficient to state a claim before the Court will order that it be served on the defendants.” (ECF No. 3, at PAGEID # 30.) The Court accordingly DIRECTS the Magistrate Judge to conduct an initial screen of Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and issue a report and recommendation. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ Gregory L. Frost GREGORY L. FROST UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE    

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?