Williams v. Carper et al

Filing 23

ORDER granting 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim; adopting Report and Recommendations re 21 Report and Recommendations.. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 9/8/2016. (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION Shawn Lamar Williams, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 2:16-cv-13 Jennifer Carper, et al., Defendants. ORDER Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed this action under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against two captains at the Ross Correctional Institution (defendants Carper and Yates) and Daren Hall, another employee at the institution. This matter is now before the court on the August 5, 2016, report and recommendation of the magistrate judge, which recommended that the court grant defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s amended complaint for failure to state a claim under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments upon which relief can be granted. The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties that objections to the report and recommendation were due within fourteen days, and that the failure to object to the report and recommendation “will result in a waiver of the right to de novo review by the District Judge and waiver of the right to appeal the judgment of the District Court.” Doc. 21, p. 6. The time period for filing objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and no objections to the report and recommendation have been filed. The report and recommendation (Doc. 21) is adopted. motion to dismiss (Doc. 16) is granted, and this action The is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Date: September 8, 2016 s/James L. Graham James L. Graham United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?