Clark v. Ohio Adult Parole Authority et al
OPINION AND ORDER denying (4) Motion to Amend/Correct; adopting Report and Recommendations re (6) Report and Recommendations. in case 2:16-cv-00413-JLG-KAJ in case 2:16-cv-00414-JLG-KAJ. Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 3/17/2017. Associated Cases: 2:16-cv-00204-JLG-KAJ, 2:16-cv-00413-JLG-KAJ, 2:16-cv-00414-JLG-KAJ (ds)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
CASE NO. 2:16-CV-00204
JUDGE JAMES L. GRAHAM
Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson
OHIO ADULT PAROLE
AUTHORITY, et al.,
OPINION AND ORDER
On February 6, 2017, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation
recommending that Respondent’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 16) be granted, that Petitioner’s
Motion to Amend (ECF No. 19) be denied, that Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF
No. 18) be denied, and that this consolidated action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 be dismissed.
(ECF No. 22.)
Petitioner has filed an Objection to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and
Recommendation. (ECF No. 23.)
Petitioner objects to all of the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations, with the exception of
the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation that his request for monetary damages be denied.
Petitioner again raises all of the same arguments he previously presented.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court has conducted a de novo review. For the
reasons already well detailed in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, Petitioner’s
Objection (ECF No. 23) is OVERRULED. The Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 22) is
ADOPTED and AFFIRMED.
Petitioner’s Motion to Amend (ECF No. 19) is DENIED.
Petitioner’s Motion to Stay Proceedings (ECF No. 18) is DENIED. Respondent’s Motion to
Dismiss (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED. This action is hereby DISMISSED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: March 17, 2017
_______s/James L. Graham
JAMES L. GRAHAM
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?