Davis v. Warden Chillicothe Correctional Institution
Filing
35
ORDER FOR REPORT ON SCHEDULING MATTERS - It is hereby ORDERED that counsel for the parties confer and provide the Court a status report, not later than July 16, 2018, noting their respective positions on any additional filings needed or whether the case is now ripe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz on 7/2/2018. (kpf)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION AT COLUMBUS
VON CLARK DAVIS,
Petitioner,
:
- vs -
Case No. 2:16-cv-495
District Judge Susan J. Dlott
Magistrate Judge Michael R. Merz
TIMOTHY SHOOP,1 Warden,
Chillicothe Correctional Institution,
:
Respondent.
ORDER FOR REPORT ON SCHEDULING MATTERS
This capital habeas corpus case under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is before the Court sua sponte for
a status review.
The Magistrate Judge filed an Order for Answer on November 28, 2016, which set
deadlines for an answer and reply (ECF No. 12). With a number of agreed extensions of time,
Petitioner filed his Reply on December 18, 2017 (ECF No. 29). Shortly before that, Petitioner
moved to amend to add a claim under Hurst v. Florida, __ U.S. __, 136 S.Ct. 616, 624 (2016)(ECF
No. 25). The Magistrate Judge’s Decision denying that Motion was affirmed by District Judge
Dlott on January 26, 2018 (ECF No. 34). Nothing has been filed in the case since that date.
In Petitioner’s Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order of December 14, 2016), it
1
The Court has been advised by the Ohio Attorney General’s Office that Timothy Shoop has succeeded Charlotte
Jenkins as the Warden at the Chillicothe Correctional Institution (ECF No. 1404 in Case No. 2:11-cv-1016). Pursuant
to Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(d), Mr. Shoop is substituted for Ms. Jenkins as Respondent herein and the caption amended as
set forth above.
1
was represented to the Court that after the pleading were complete,
[T]he parties will confer again to address, among other matters,
proposed deadlines for any motion for discovery and whether
Petitioner will seek to file a motion to expand the record and/or for
an evidentiary hearing. In addition, the parties plan to confer in the
near future about materials that Petitioner has preliminarily
identified as missing from the Appendix the Warden has filed, (ECF
No. 3), and the Warden will file any supplement to that appendix as
soon as practicable.
(ECF No. 13, PageID 8888). Nothing referred to in this paragraph has been filed.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that counsel for the parties confer and provide the
Court a status report, not later than July 16, 2018, noting their respective positions on any
additional filings needed or whether the case is now ripe.
July 2, 2018.
s/ Michael R. Merz
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?