Coach, Inc., et al. v. Bromelow, et al.
Filing
24
ORDER - The CLERK is DIRECTED to ENTER DEFAULT against Defendant Mels Imagination in this matter. Plaintiffs request for default judgment (ECF No. 22 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Signed by Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Preston Deavers on 2/6/2017. (agm)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
COACH, INC. et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Civil Action 2:16-cv-729
Judge Algenon L. Marbley
Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers
v.
MELANIE BROMELOW et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER
This matter is before the Court for consideration of Plaintiffs’ Motion for Default
Judgment against Defendant Mel’s Imagination (ECF No. 22). For the reasons that follow, the
Court DENIES Plaintiff's Motion WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Prior to seeking a default judgment, Plaintiffs must first obtain an entry of default as
contemplated by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). United Coin Meter Co. v. Seaboard
Coastline R.R., 705 F.2d 839, 844 (6th Cir. 1983) (internal quotation omitted); Brantley v.
Runyon, No. C-1-96-842, 1997 WL 373739, at *1 (S.D. Ohio June 19, 1997). “Then, pursuant to
Rule 55(c), the defendant has an opportunity to seek to have the entry set aside. If that motion is
not made or is unsuccessful, and if no hearing is needed to ascertain damages, judgment by
default may be entered by the court or, if the defendant has not appeared, by the clerk.” United
Coin Meter Co., 705 F.2d at 844. Plaintiffs’ request for default judgment, therefore, is premature
because the Clerk has not entered default against Defendants pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 55(a).
1
In the interests of judicial economy, however, the Court construes Plaintiffs’ motion as a
motion for entry of default. Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on July 25, 2016. (ECF. No. 1.) The
record shows that summons were returned executed as to Defendants Melanie Bromelow and
Mel’s Imagination on November 28, 2016. (ECF No. 14.) The time for Defendants to answer or
otherwise plead expired December 19, 2016. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. Defendant Mel’s Imagination,
however, has not filed an answer or other responsive pleading.
On February 2, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiffs to show cause as to why the Court
should not dismiss the action against Mel’s Imagination for want of prosecution. (ECF No. 20.)
On February 3, 2017, Plaintiffs filed the instant motion. Because it appears that Defendant Mel’s
Imagination was properly served with a summons and copy of the Complaint and have failed to
plead or otherwise defend in this matter, an Entry of Default is appropriate pursuant to Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). Following the Clerk’s entry of default, Plaintiffs shall have leave
to renew their motion for default judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b).
Accordingly, the CLERK is DIRECTED to ENTER DEFAULT against Defendant
Mel’s Imagination in this matter. Furthermore, without expressing any opinion as to whether
Plaintiffs are entitled to default judgment, Plaintiffs’ request for default judgment is DENIED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: February 6, 2017
/s/ Elizabeth A. Preston Deavers
ELIZABETH A. PRESTON DEAVERS
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?