Sarvino v. Commissioner of Social Security
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations re 21 Report and Recommendations.Signed by Judge James L. Graham on 5/10/2017. (ds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Mary J. Sarvino,
Case No. 2:16-cv-792
This matter is before the court for consideration of the April
7, 2017, report and recommendation of the United States magistrate
judge to whom this case was referred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §636(b).
The magistrate judge recommended that the case be remanded to the
Commissioner pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §405(g), sentence four, for
The magistrate judge concluded that further
consideration of the opinions of Drs. Rowland and Whatley was
speciality in a related field, and that additional analysis of the
testimony of the vocational expert was needed concerning whether
plaintiff can perform.
The report and recommendation specifically advised the parties
that failure to object to the report and recommendation within
fourteen days of the report “will result in a waiver of the right
to have the district judge review the Report and Recommendation de
novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the
Doc. 21, p. 15.
The time period for filing
objections to the report and recommendation has expired, and no
party has objected to the report and recommendation.
magistrate judge (Doc. 21).
The decision of the Commissioner is
reversed, and this case is remanded to the Commissioner pursuant to
§405(g), sentence four, for further proceedings in accordance with
the report and recommendation.
The clerk shall enter judgment
remanding this case to the Commissioner.
Date: May 10, 2017
s/James L. Graham
James L. Graham
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?