Getachew v. Ashland City
Filing
3
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. This matter is transferred to the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, for all further rulings, including a ruling on Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 11/1/2016. (cw)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
ALEMAYEHU GETACHEW,
Plaintiff,
v.
ASHLAND CITY,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
ORDER
Case No. 16-cv-920
JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY
Magistrate Judge Kemp
Before the Court are Plaintiff’s September 26, 2016 Motion for Leave to Proceed in
forma pauperis (Doc. 1), and the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as to said
motion, recommending that the matter be transferred to the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern
Division, for all further proceedings, including a ruling on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to
proceed. (Doc. 2 at 1-2.)
The Report and Recommendation specifically advised parties “that failure to object to the
Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to have the district judge review
the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the
decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation.” (Doc. 2 at 3 (citing
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).)
Objections were due October 21, 2016. Neither party has objected.
It is therefore ORDERED that this matter be transferred to the Northern District of Ohio,
Eastern Division, for all further rulings, including a ruling on Plaintiff’s motion for leave to
proceed.
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Algenon L. Marbley
ALGENON L. MARBLEY
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Dated: November 1, 2016
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?