Edmonds v. Licking County et al

Filing 4

ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 3 in that this case is DISMISSED for want of prosecution. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 2/2/17. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION BRANDON G. EDMONDS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:16-cv-921 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH Magistrate Judge Jolson LICKING COUNTY, et al., Defendants. ORDER On January 6, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation recommending this case be dismissed for want of prosecution. (Doc. 3). On September 27, 2016, Plaintiff was ordered to pay the $400.00 filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis within thirty days, and further notified that failure to do so would result in dismissal of this case for want of prosecution. (Doc. 2). Because Plaintiff failed to do as ordered, the Magistrate Judge now recommends that this case be dismissed. The parties were specifically advised of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation and of the consequences of their failure to do so. There has nevertheless been no objection to the Order and Report and Recommendation. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. The Clerk shall remove Document 3 from the Court’s pending motions list and close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ George C. Smith__________________ GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?