Wilson et al v. Chagrin Valley Steel Erectors, Inc.
OPINION AND ORDER granting 37 Chagrin Valley Steel Erector's 56(d) Motion. Chagrin Valley has sufficiently demonstrated how the materials it hopes to obtain with further discovery would help it oppose summary judgment. However, discovery cl osed nearly one month prior to Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant filing their Motion for Summary Judgment. It is unclear whether Chagrin Valley is entitled to the discovery it seeks, or whether it is appropriately discoverable information. Wheth er Chagrin Valley's discovery request is meritorious will be determined by Magistrate Judge Jolson. Until her decision, the Court HOLDS IN ABEYANCE the Motion for Summary Judgment of Plaintiffs and Third-Party Defendant Justin Helmick. Signed by Chief Judge Edmund A. Sargus on 10/10/2017. (dh1)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?