Schiff et al v. Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc. et al
Filing
44
OPINION AND ORDER: Plaintiffs are GRANTED $13,897.75 in attorney's fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 2/28/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
SCOTT W. SCHIFF, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
Case No. 2:17-CV-00237-MHW
JUDGE MICHAEL H. WATSON
Magistrate Judge Jolson
v.
EXCLUSIVE LEGAL MARKETING,
INC., et. al.
Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
In its February 20, 2018 Opinion and Order ruling on Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions
(Doc. 33), the Court made the following findings: Defendants Exclusive Legal Marketing, Inc.
(“ELM”) and Coety Bryant failed to obey this Court’s discovery orders for many months (Doc.
43 at 5); Plaintiffs suffered clear prejudice based on Defendants’ disobedience (id.); the
attorney’s fees sought by Plaintiffs, which total $13,897.75, are not disproportionate to the value
of this case (id. at 6); and Mr. Bryant’s representations related to his inability to pay were
insufficient to support the conclusion that a sanction award would be unjust (id. at 6–7).
Consequently, the Court granted Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions, but refrained from awarding
costs and fees until Defendants had the opportunity to file any documentation demonstrating an
inability to pay. (Doc. 43). The Court thus directed Mr. Bryant to file any such documentation
within seven days and additionally directed the parties to meet and confer in an effort to resolve
the issue. (Id. at 1).
On February 22, 2018, the Court received a joint status report from the parties that stated
Mr. Bryant alleged during the meet and confer that “he had no monetary assets and could not
make any offer of monetary compensation, but that he would be providing this Court with
information to demonstrate that he had no assets.”
Mr. Bryant, however, filed no such
documentation, and the time for doing so has passed.
Upon review of Plaintiffs’ fee documentation (Doc. 33-1), the Court finds the requested
fees of $13,897.75 to be reasonable. Moreover, even to the extent that paying the fees presents
some hardship to Defendants, the Court finds that based upon all the facts and circumstances of
this action, awarding Plaintiffs’ their expenses is not unjust.
Accordingly, Plaintiffs are
GRANTED $13,897.75 in attorney’s fees.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: February 28, 2018
/s/Kimberly A. Jolson
KIMBERLY A. JOLSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?