Jennings v. Mohr et al

Filing 8

ORDER ADOPTING and AFFIRMING the REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 3 in that Plaintiff's Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 7/13/17. (sem)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION GREGORY ALLEN JENNINGS, Plaintiff, vs. Case No.: 2:17-cv-248 JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH Magistrate Judge Jolson GARY MOHR, et al., Defendants. ORDER On May 8, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation granting Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis and after conducting an initial screen, recommended that this action be dismissed. (See Report and Recommendation, Doc. 3). On June 6, 2017, the Court adopted the Report and Recommendation, noting no objections were filed. (Doc. 4). Plaintiff, on the same day, submitted a motion for extension of time to file objections. (Doc. 6). The Court then vacated the previous Order adopting the Report and Recommendation. (Doc. 7). In the Court’s Order on June 8, 2017, Plaintiff was given 30 days to file any objections to the Report and Recommendation, but again has failed to timely file objections. Further, he was advised of this right and of the consequences of his failure to file objections. The Report and Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED and AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby DISMISSED pursuant to Section 1915(e)(2). The Clerk shall remove Document 3 from the Court’s pending motions list and terminate this case. IT IS SO ORDERED. /s/ George C. Smith__________________ GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?