Halliburton Energy Services Inc v. Snyder et al
ORDER granting 83 Motion to Stay Third-Party Defendant Jody Babcocks responsive pleading deadline. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 4/11/2018. Ms. Babcock and Halliburton are DIRECTED to propose a responsive pleading deadline in their upcoming Rule 26(f) Report. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
Civil Action 2:17-cv-349
Judge Michael H. Watson
Magistrate Judge Jolson
ADAM L. SYNDER, et al,
This matter is before the Court on Third-Party Defendant Jody Babcock’s second
unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Move or Plead in Response to Third-Party Plaintiff
Ohio Valley Corporate Housing, LLC’s Third-Party Complaint. (Doc. 83). Although styled as
an extension, the relief Ms. Babcock is actually seeking is a stay of her responsive pleading
deadline. (Id.). Counsel for Ms. Babcock has suggested that when filing the Rule 26(f) Report
for the upcoming preliminary pretrial conference, both Ms. Babcock and Halliburton—whose
responsive pleading deadline was stayed by the Court on December 1, 2017 (Doc. 67)—will
jointly propose a responsive pleading deadline for both parties. For good cause shown, the
Motion is GRANTED.
Consequently, Third-Party Defendant Jody Babcock’s responsive
pleading is STAYED, but Ms. Babcock and Halliburton are DIRECTED to propose a
responsive pleading deadline in their upcoming Rule 26(f) Report.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Date: April 11, 2018
/s/ Kimberly A. Jolson
KIMBERLY A. JOLSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?