Howell v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration

Filing 3

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge RECOMMENDS denying 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and RECOMMENDS that Plaintiff be given ten (10) days from the date of the adoption of this Report and Recommendation to pay the appropriate filing fee. Objections to R&R due by 6/9/2017. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 5/26/2017. (ew)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION WILLIAM J. HOWELL, SR. Plaintiff, v. Civil Action 2:17-cv-409 Judge Algenon L. Marbley Magistrate Judge Jolson COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION On May 12, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). (Doc. 1). As previously explained (See Doc. 2), in Adkins v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours & Co., Inc., 335 U.S. 331 (1948), the Supreme Court set forth the legal standard applicable to a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. An affidavit of poverty is sufficient if it reflects that the plaintiff cannot pay the Court’s filing fee without depriving himself and his dependents the “necessities of life.” Id. at 339 (internal quotation marks omitted). Upon review of Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, the Court noted he had filed a shortform application, and thus could not determine whether a one-time payment of the Court’s filing fee would render Plaintiff unable to provide for himself and his dependents. (See Doc. 2). Consequently, on May 15, 2017, the Court ordered Plaintiff to complete the long-form application within ten days. (Id.). Ten days have passed and Plaintiff has failed to submit a long-form application in accordance with the Court’s May 15, 2017 Order. Accordingly, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 1) be denied. Further, it is RECOMMENDED that Plaintiff be given ten (10) days from the date of adoption of this Report and Recommendation to pay the appropriate filing fee. Procedure on Objections If any party objects to this Report and Recommendation, that party may, within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Report, file and serve on all parties written objections to those specific proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made, together with supporting authority for the objection(s). A Judge of this Court shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the Report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made. Upon proper objections, a Judge of this Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made herein, may receive further evidence or may recommit this matter to the Magistrate Judge with instructions. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The parties are specifically advised that failure to object to the Report and Recommendation will result in a waiver of the right to have the District Judge review the Report and Recommendation de novo, and also operates as a waiver of the right to appeal the decision of the District Court adopting the Report and Recommendation. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: May 26, 2017 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson KIMBERLY A. JOLSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?