Teitelbaum v. Turner

Filing 19

ORDER denying as moot 16 Motion to Compel. Petitioner shall have an additional 21 days from the date of this Order to file a supplement to his Traverse if he deems necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. Jolson on 1/31/2018. (ew)(This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION DANIEL TEITELBAUM, Petitioner, v. Case No. 2:17-cv-583 Judge Michael H. Watson Magistrate Judge Jolson NEIL TURNER, Respondent. ORDER On January 2, 2018, Petitioner filed a Motion to Compel, requesting that Respondent be ordered to serve on the Petitioner a copy of the state trial transcripts. (Doc. 16). Although Respondent filed a Notice of Filing of Trial Transcripts on October 31, 2017 (Doc. 14), Petitioner indicates he had not been served with a copy of those documents. Respondent subsequently failed to file a response to the Motion to Compel. Accordingly, on January 30, 2018, the undersigned directed Respondent to show cause within seven days why the Motion to Compel should not be granted. (Doc. 17). Respondent filed a Response on January 31, 2018, stating that “simultaneous to the filing of [the] Response, he has forwarded to Petitioner Teitelbaum a copy of the Transcripts filed in this case as Doc. 14-1.” (Doc. 18). Because Respondent has agreed to serve the state trial transcripts on Petitioner, the Motion to Compel (Doc. 16) is DENIED AS MOOT. In light of the fact that Petitioner did not previously have access to the state trial transcripts, Petitioner shall have an additional twenty-one (21) days from the date of this Order to file a supplement to his Traverse to the answer (Doc. 15), if he deems necessary. The supplement shall not be longer than ten pages. IT IS SO ORDERED. Date: January 31, 2017 /s/ Kimberly A. Jolson KIMBERLY A. JOLSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?