Pippin v. City of Reynoldsburg, et al.

Filing 53

ORDER STAYING CASE pending the Supreme Court's decisions. Signed by Judge Algenon L. Marbley on 6/14/2019. (cw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION : JAMES PIPPIN, : : Case No. 2:17-cv-598 Plaintiff, : : JUDGE ALGENON L. MARBLEY v. : : Magistrate Judge Vascura CITY OF REYNOLDSBURG, et al., : : Defendants. : ORDER This Court held a telephonic status conference on Thursday, June 13, 2019 to discuss case progress with the parties. This Court takes notice that the United States Supreme Court is currently considering two cases that would be dispositive of the questions presented in this case. The two cases before the Supreme Court with direct bearing on Plaintiff’s claims and Defendants’ Motions are McDonough v. Smith, No. 18-485, and Knick v. Township of Scott, PA, No. 17-647. McDonough would clarify a statute of limitations question left open after Manuel v. Joliet, 580 U.S. ___ (2017), 137 S. Ct. 911, while Knick would clarify whether the Supreme Court’s rule from Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985) continues to govern federal takings claims. Rather than resolve the issues at bar while the Supreme Court considers these questions, this Court hereby STAYS all proceedings in this case. This Court will resume consideration of the pending Motions to Dismiss when the cases at the Supreme Court have been decided and there is sufficient guidance on the new state of the law to allow this Court to proceed. During the status conference, all parties agreed with the decision to stay these proceedings pending the Supreme Court’s decisions. IT IS SO ORDERED. s/ Algenon L. Marbley ALGENON L. MARBLEY UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: June 14, 2019

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?