Weathers v. Aerotek, Inc.

Filing 12

ORDER adopting 8 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiff's Complaint is hereby Dismissed. Signed by Judge George C. Smith on 10/5/2017. (df) (This document has been sent by regular mail to the party(ies) listed in the NEF that did not receive electronic notification.) Modified text on 10/5/2017 (df).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO
EASTERN DIVISION
LARRY WAYNE WEATHERS,
Plaintiff,
vs.

Case No.: 2:17-cv-683
JUDGE GEORGE C. SMITH
Magistrate Judge Vascura

AEROTEK, INC.,
Defendant.

ORDER
On September 11, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge issued an Order and Report
and Recommendation recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma
Pauperis be granted and that Plaintiff’s Complaint be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted. (See Order and Report and Recommendation, Doc. 8). The parties
were advised of their right to object to the Order and Report and Recommendation. This matter
is now before the Court on Plaintiff’s Objections to the Order and Report and Recommendation.
(See Doc. 11). The Court will consider the matter de novo. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b)(3).
Plaintiff merely asserts in his objection to the Order and Report and Recommendation
what his claim is, discrimination. He has failed to state sufficient grounds to review the
Magistrate Judge’s well-reasoned Order and Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff’s general
objections are not sufficient to preserve any issues for review, and “[a] general objection to the
entirety of the magistrate’s report has the same effects as would a failure to objection.” Howard

v. Sec’y of H.H.S., 932 F.2d 505, 509 (6th Cir. 1991). Therefore, for the reasons stated in detail
in the Order and Report and Recommendation, this Court finds that Plaintiff’s Objections are
without merit and are hereby OVERRULED.
The Order and Report and Recommendation, Document 8, is hereby ADOPTED and
AFFIRMED. Plaintiff’s Complaint is hereby dismissed.
The Clerk shall remove Documents 8 and 11 from the Court’s pending motions list. The
Clerk shall terminate this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
/s/ George C. Smith__________________
GEORGE C. SMITH, JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2